Thursday, August 21, 2014
  Search 
Home
Opportunities
Partners
Publications
About Us
 
 
Please enter your email here, we would like to keep you informed.
 
 
Connect With Us - Facebook RSS
<August 2014>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
Sections
Liberty In The News
Liberty Events
Conference Proceedings
Culture
Agriculture
Democracy
Development is the Key
Economic Freedom
Education for Life
Enterpreneurship
Environment
Freedom of Expression
Freedom to Trade
Globalization for the Good
Health is Wealth
Intellectual Property Rights
International Relations
Liberty is Security
Limited Government
Principles of Politics
Privatisation
Population - the ultimate resource
Property Rights
Regulatory Affairs
Rule of Law
Tax Freedom
Facts & Figures
Opportunities
Competitions
 Principles of Politics
 
What does a liberal mean?
Cafe Hayek, United States Saturday, March 28, 2009

Donald J. Boudreaux
One of the great tenets of liberalism is that no human being is less worthy just because he or she is outside of a particular group. Any stranger from Cairo or Cancun has as much claim on my sympathies, my respect and my regard as any stranger from Charlottesville or Chicago. Liberalism recognizes that people are part of families and friendships and a variety of different kinds of associations. And they reject the romantic nonsense that demands that each person "love" or "care for" everyone in the same way as himself, his family, and his friends, writes Donald Boudreaux in the Cafe Hayek.

I am a liberal

 

I love and care for my family and friends more than I care for mere acquaintances, and I care about most mere acquaintances more than I care about total strangers.  But the nationalities or physical locations of these people's residences are irrelevant to me.  I care no more for a stranger in my town of Burke, Virginia, than I care for a stranger in Beijing, Beirut, or Berlin.  If this claim sounds harsh, let me say the very same thing differently: I care as much about a stranger in Beijing, Beirut, or Berlin as I care about a stranger in Burke, Virginia.  I accord all strangers the same rights and respect.  I regard the well-being of strangers in foreign countries to be no less important than I regard the well-being of strangers in America.

 

One of the great tenets of liberalism -- the true sort of liberalism, not the dirigiste ignorance that today, in English-speaking countries, flatters itself unjustifiably with that term -- is that no human being is less worthy just because he or she is outside of a particular group.  Any randomly chosen stranger from Cairo or Cancun has as much claim on my sympathies and my respect and my regard as does any randomly chosen person from Charlottesville or Chicago.

 

Liberalism recognizes that people are part of families and friendships and a variety of different kinds of associations.  Liberals encourage, or at least tolerate, any and all forms of voluntary associations, from marital ones to religious ones to trading ones.  Liberals reject the romantic nonsense that demands that each person "love" or "care for" everyone in the same way that that person loves and cares for himself, his family, and his friends.

 

But liberalism rejects the notion that there is anything much special or compelling about political relationships.  It is tribalistic, atavistic, to regard those who look more like you to be more worthy of your regard than are those who look less like you.  It is tribalistic, atavistic, to regard those who speak your native tongue to be more worthy of your affection and concern than are those whose native tongues differ from yours.

 

For the true liberal, the human race is the human race.  The struggle is to cast off as much as possible primitive sentiments about "us" being different from "them."

 

The liberal is fully aware that such sentiments are rooted in humans' evolved psychology, and so are not easily cast off.  But the liberal does his or her best to rise above those atavistic sentiments,

 

The liberal is also fully aware that most people will never rise above such sentiments.  But because rising above these sentiments is a value worth pursuing -- because casting off what is now the irrational feeling that a stranger who happens also to be a fellow citizen of your country is thereby a more worthy person, someone more important to you and your well-being than is a stranger who happens to be "foreign" -- the liberal points out, as occasions permit, that what matters is that people be free to associate as much as possible as they voluntarily choose without being constrained by culture or by force to associate on different terms with foreigners than with fellow citizens.  

This article was published in the Cafe Hayek on Saturday, March 28, 2009. Please read the original article here.
Author : Prof Boudreaux is chairman of the Department of Economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA
Tags- Find more articles on - liberals

Post your Comments on this Article

Name  
Email    
Comment  
Comments will be moderated

More Related Articles
Principles of Politics
More Articles


 
An Initiative of
LIBERTY INSTITUTE, INDIA
All rights reserved.